As many Torontonians may have already heard, the Toronto District School Board has recently approved the planning of a new school to be built for black-focused subjects. This is in response to statistical studies stating that the majority of people in black communities drop out of high school. Its aim is to renew interest in education for future drop outs who apparently believe that the current education system is too euro-centric.
Frankly... I think thats a naive load of bull.
1896 Plessy v. Fergusson followed by
1954... Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka ring any bells
for anyone?
I don't see anything wrong with having more diverse subjects
available to all students, but I don't see how having a segregated school will
benefit anyone at all. In principal, such a school is counterintuitive in
terms of achieving a system that provides equal opportunities for all students.
Although the school may not be racially segregated based on enrollment, it will
be considered segregated based on the ability to provide its students with
adequate opportunities. Too much of a divergence from a standard curriculum
might negatively effect the way in which a university admissions boards view
applicants from such a school. The issue
of funding will also be a major ongoing issue for the school. Lack of funding
and poor facilities could spell disaster by making the students worse off than
if they were to remain in the current system. This would hardly be a solution
of giving students equal opportunities for successful futures, let alone curbing drop outs.
It can be assumed that this school will suffer from funding
issues due to several reasons. First and foremost is the fact that the Province
of Ontario refuses to provide such
funding to the TDSB. One reason might be
because the prospect of opening a single school is very costly compared to its
expected future benefits, if any. The benefits will only be observable in a
small population of students, within the locality in which the school is
situated, and not the majority of students throughout Toronto.
There are more effective ways of achieving a diversified curriculum for the
interest all students. One means would be to reform of the curriculum being
offered in certain TDSB schools. In lieu cost associated with building a new
school from scratch (building cost, land rent, capital and maintenance costs
etc.), the cost of reallocating qualified teachers, training new ones, and
properly planning out a curriculum within our current system cannot possibly be
more than a new school. Although this would require long term planning and a slow phase in
period, the long term benefits would logically outweigh those currently
proposed by the TDSB. Since there are more effective options available, it is
hardly likely that the Province of Ontario
will support the use of taxpayer’s dollars on a poorly thought out idea. The
alternative, private funding raises many difficulties of its own if we assume
that the majority of families that are sending their children to the school
cannot afford to do so.
The argument that a black-focused curriculum is necessary to
curbing drop out rates is a weak one. With respect to drop out rates, the root
causes are not weighted on the lack of a culturally focused education system,
but on societal issues such as poverty, and the structure of communities and
families. As for the lack of motivation, interest and active participation in education
amongst drop outs… That’s another sorry and lame ass excuse for this school. Dropping out of school due to a lack of interest in the subject matter is another perfect example of people taking their opportunities for granted. There are people in this world who cant go to school because there are none! If its motivation you seek to give the students then just do it. My motivation
came from the fear of getting beat on the head with a feather duster, coat hanger,other miscellaneous house hold objects, or an iron backhand from the parents that would make Bruce Lee's infamous 1'' punch look like a cuddley hug from Barney (a little extreme,
but motivation none the less that saves money). There are things which just can’t
be taught in school. Education in proper values, ethics/morality and life
skills are more likely to change the drop out statistics than a single school alone.
This is irrespective of race or gender despite the stats.The focus of high schools should be the
preparation of its students towards the real world. Although I support a
diversified curriculum, there shouldn’t be such a huge fuss over
cultural-history solving society’s problems. If its cultural history you want,
there’s plenty in programs at the university level. Don’t want to go to
university? Then get a job and go to the library on you’re spare time. Can’t
afford university? There’s something called a loan, working a job while you
study, and maybe even being a part time student. Cant afford university because you need to support a family? Tough... but I think you'll agree with me that cultural studies are the last of your worries ontop of the 3 jobs you're working ATM. To the dropouts who use the excuse that the system is eurocentric: get over it. others have, and they've done well.
Still want cultural history at
a high school level?? Then tell the TDSB that there are better ways to go about
doing it. It seems to me that the proposed plan for a black focus school is nothing
more then a quick fix / band aid solution being placed on a much larger problem
that demands more planning and thought.
That’s just my two cents.
I’m too tired to ramble anymore and I'm not even going to bother editing this post because I know its probably incoherent as is… time to crash… maybe I’ll
edit this on another day.